Israel To Strike Iran?


WASHINGTON – One of the nation’s leading liberal minds is convinced Israel will do what it has to do to survive, suggesting the country may act on its own and attack Iran, despite President Obama’s nuclear deal.

Former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowtiz told WND, “I have to tell you, if (Israeli Prime Minister) Benjamin Netanyahu learns through credible intelligence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, he will not allow that to happen.”

Dershowitz is a Democrat and generally a supporter of Obama, but the professor divided sharply with the president over his nuclear deal with Iran.

“I don’t think it’s a good deal,” said Dershowitz. “I wish they had been more transparent. I wish it had gone before Congress as a treaty. But the administration chose to make it an executive order.”

The famous constitutional scholar and defender of Israel was in Washington to accept a prestigious award, honored as a “Speaker of Truth” by the pro-Israel organization EMET last week.

And it put him in a curious position. It is unlikely that Dershowitz has ever before been on a list including such staunch conservatives as previous honorees Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Dr. Charles Krauthammer; former Gov. Mike Huckabee, R-Ark.; former U.S. Ambassador John Bolton; and former Rep. Allen West, R-Fla.

But Dershowitz couldn’t have appeared to be more delighted or honored, showing the high bipartisan regard in which EMET is held by strong supporters of Israel on both sides of the aisle. There is usually a Democrat among the half-dozen, or so, EMET honorees every year since 2007.

Honored this year, in addition to Dershowitz were:

  • Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla.: Chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
  • Brian Mast: U.S. Army veteran and former Israeli Defense Forces volunteer. He served under elite Joint Special Operations Command as a bomb disposal expert. Mast loss of both legs to an IED in Afghanistan in 2010.
  • Frank Gaffney: Founder and president of the Center for Security Policy. Gaffney served as the assistant secretary of defense for international security policy for President Ronald Reagan.
  • Raheel Raza: Muslim-Canadian award-winning author, journalist, public speaker and human rights activist.

When asked by WND if the president had a blind spot when it came to Israel’s security, Dershowitz replied, “I think it’s a mixed picture.”

“My Israeli friends who are in the security business tell me that this administration has been quite good. They supported Israel’s self-defense efforts in Gaza, they opposed the Goldstone Report (a 2009 U.N. report accusing Israel of war crimes in Gaza), they oppose the BDS (boycott, divestment sanctions) movement, they have provided Israel with weaponry and are now in the process of trying to finalize a military allocation.”

But, he noted, “The area I think where Israel and the United States are in most disagreement is Iran, which is, of course, a security issue. If you ask this administration, they will tell you they think they are protecting Israel’s security for the next 10 years. I don’t agree with that. Benjamin Netanyahu doesn’t agree with that.”

The professor mentioned the other areas of major disagreement have been the settlements (he sides with administration in generally opposing them) and the peace process, “And I really do think that the Obama administration is wrong when it comes to criticizing Israel on the peace process. Israel has offered to make peace in 2000, 2001 and 2008. You can go back to 1937, 1947… It’s been the Palestinians who have refused to negotiate a reasonable two state solution.”

He concluded, “I am disappointed in the Obama administration’s overall approach to Israel. My disappointment is primarily a function of the Iran deal.”

Introducing him at the awards dinner last Wednesday, EMET Founder Sarah Stern lavished high praise on the guest of honor, saying, “There’s probably no human being alive today who’s done more to challenge the antisemites, the anti-Zionists and the BDSers on college campuses today and throughout the world than Alan Dershowitz.”

In his keynote speech, the professor focused primarily on the danger to Israel of the BDS movement, which has grown virulent on campuses in America and abroad.

“The goal of BDS is not to actually get universities to divest (in Israel), it is to mis-educate students and future leaders,” he began, “by lying to them, by demonizing, delegitimizing, discriminating against, and applying a double standard to the nation-state of the Jewish people.

“The goal of BDS is to destroy Israel.”

To convey the depth and breadth of misinformation about Israel on campuses, Dershowitz told the story of being recently challenged to debate the BDS movement at the Oxford Union, the oldest debate union in the world.

“Winston Churchill has debated there. I’ve been asked to debate several times at the Oxford Union, and I was always told by the honest people who run it, ‘You cannot win a debate at Oxford when you are on the side of Israel. And you certainly can’t win a debate on BDS.’ Oxford is the home of the BDS movement. It’s where it started,” the professor who retired from Harvard in 2013 explained.

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz debates BDS at Oxford University, England in 2015

Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz debates BDS at Oxford University, England in Nov. 2015

Dershowitz was originally asked to debate Omar Barghouti, the founder of the BDS movement. “But he refused to debate me because, he said, I am part of the group that has to be boycotted. I’m not an Israeli, but I’m a Jew and I support Israel, so he refused to debate me. He was boycotting me.”

Barghouti also forbade a woman from debating him.

“Finally, they got a man, a very good debater, named Peter Tatchell, who is one of the leaders of the human rights movement in Great Britain, and he was a very distinguished and very difficult opponent.”

Dershowitz described how the debate turned on a key admission, when his opponent acknowledged that the BDS movement applied only to Israel.

“For many people in the audience, that was a shock. They did not know this. The young students of Oxford thought that BDS being applied fairly and across the board.”

And, once Tatchell acknowledged that, Dershowitz went out into the audience and said, “Ladies and gentlemen, I issue you all a challenge. I will wait all day, but I want any of you here to name one country in the world faced with threats comparable to those faced by Israel, that has had a better record of human rights, a higher regard for the rule of law, and more concern for the lives of enemy civilians. Alright, I’m waiting.”

The silence just went on and on.

“I said I have all day,” relayed Dershowitz. “‘Shout out a country. Shout out any country.’ Of course they couldn’t, because there is no such country.”

Finally, as a joke, a student from the back yelled out, “Iceland!”

And, the professor said, “Ya got me!”

“But, in the end, we won the debate, which was shocking. People at Oxford University supported the opposition to the BDS movement.”

Dershowitz won by a vote of 137 to 101.

“I don’t tell this story to praise myself as a debater,” the legal scholar told the throng of hundreds at the EMET dinner.

“I tell this story to tell you not to give up, even in the most-extreme, hard-left environments. We have truth on our side,” he said, distinctly enunciating each word with emphasis. “It is a powerful, powerful weapon.”

“A strong Israel is required to get peace. Never apologize for your strength,” Dershowitz concluded.
Original Article:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.