Rittenhouse Verdict: Not Guilty Of Homicide, Reckless Endangerment

Kyle Rittenhouse sits at the defense table during his homicide trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty of all charges against him Friday, including intentional homicide – the most serious of five charges against him in a case that largely divided America along political and racial lines more than a year after he shot three men during a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Rittenhouse fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz during often violent protests in the summer of 2020 following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man, in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse, 17 at the time, faced charges ranging from intentional homicide to reckless and attempted homicide. 

The Rittenhouse case garnered national attention from the beginning, a reflection of the country’s division over race, guns and politics.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Rittenhouse stood before the jury as the verdict was read. As each not guilty verdict was read, Rittenhouse started to breakdown into tears. By the last verdict, he appeared to collapse. He was helped up and given water. Rittenhouse hugged one of his attorneys with both tears and a large smile.

Members of Rittenhouse’s family, sitting behind him in the courtroom, were all spotted in tears.

The not verdic

Tears, yelling and calls for a mistrial: What a dramatic day could mean for the Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial

Although Rittenhouse is white, as were his victims, the shootings occurred during a racial justice protest. Police mistreatment of people of color has become a cultural flashpoint on the left, just as social justice protests have for those on the right. 

Blake, whose shooting sparked the protests in Kenosha, was left paralyzed, and the white police officer who shot him was cleared of any federal or state charges.

Rittenhouse said he was in Kenosha to help the community during the unrest, but prosecutors painted him as a vigilante looking for trouble.

While Rittenhouse argued he acted in self-defense, prosecutors said he provoked the attacks by bringing his AR-15 style rifle to the protest. They also said he pointed the gun at Rosenbaum, the first man he shot, before Rosenbaum chased him, a point the defense disputed.

Although Grosskreutz was armed with a pistol, Rosenbaum and Huber were not. Prosecutors said Rittenhouse should have fled or fought without firing his gun if he feared for his safety, but the defense argued he thought the men could take his firearm and use it to kill him or others.

The trial’s eight days of testimony regularly included raw emotion and extreme tension. Rittenhouse took the stand last week in his own defense, and broke down when describing the events of Aug. 25, 2020.

“I didn’t do anything wrong,” Rittenhouse said while claiming self-defense. Later, Rittenhouse said: “I didn’t want to have to kill anybody that night.”

Some legal observers argued the prosecution bungled the entire trial, and Rittenhouse’s lawyers filed a motion for a mistrial with prejudice, meaning he could not be retried, after lines of questioning from Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger that the defense objected to.

Kyle Rittenhouse judge has gotten his share of criticism: Can a judge be removed from a case? Not likely.

The judge himself also emerged as a main character through a series of actions that left critics questioning his objectivity and supporters penning letters of praise.

Schroeder, the longest-serving current judge in Wisconsin, first drew national attention before the trial began in October, when he said the people shot by Rittenhouse couldn’t be called “victims” but could be called “rioters, looters and arsonists.”

During the trial, Schroeder angrily chastised prosecutors multiple times and prevented them from zooming in on an iPad video after suggesting that doing so could alter the footage.

Last Thursday, the 75-year-old judge sparked new criticism by making a quip about “Asian food.” And Schroeder’s attempt to honor veterans led the courtroom to applaud a man who appeared to be the only veteran in the room: a witness for the defense.

Schroeder also dismissed a charge of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18 a day before the jury began its deliberations. Another charge, for failure to comply with a state or local government emergency order, had been dismissed earlier in the trial.

Original Article:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/kyle-rittenhouse-not-guilty-of-all-counts-of-homicide-reckless-endangerment/ar-AAQUHCZ

Read More:https://jasperandsardine.wordpress.com/2021/11/18/national-guard-on-standby-for-rittenhouse-verdict/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.